Legal Opinion
In re Griffin Bros.
District Court, S.D. Alabama
Decided June 29, 1907No. 452PublishedCited by 5 opinions
In Bankruptcy.
1Opinion of the Court
TOUIYMIN, District Judge.
It is incumbent upon the creditor opposing a discharge to allege in his specifications and to prove to the court one of the statutory grounds for withholding the discharge. In re Thomas (D. C.) 1 Am. Bankr. Rep. 515, 92 Fed. 912.
■ A concealment of bankrupt’s property, in order to be a sufficient ground for refusing him a discharge, must have been knowingly and *538fraudulently made. In re Cohn (D. C.) 1 Am. Bankr. Rep. 655; In re Pierce (D. C.) 4 Am. Bankr. Rep. 554, 103 Fed. 64; In re Hixon (D. C.) 1 Am. Bankr. Rep. 610, 93 Fed. 440; In re Wetmore (D. C.) 6 Am. Bankr.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- In re ThomasDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1899
- In re PierceDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1900
- In re HirschDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1899
- In re HolmanDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1899
- In re OlesonDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1901
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re LeachDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1961
- In re KnofskyDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1927
- In re MauzyDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1908
- In re WalshDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1914
- In re LordDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1927