Legal Opinion

Crapp v. Morris

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 20, 1899PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Certiorari. Before Judge Lumpkin. Fulton superior court. September term, 1898.

1Opinion of the CourtFish, J.

1. The fact that a magistrate answered a writ of certiorari amounts to a waiver of the service of the writ and petition upon him as required by section 4643 of the Civil Code.

2. Sustaining a cértiorari for the first time, upon questions of fact, and sending the case back for a new hearing in the magistrate’s court, is equivalent to the first grant of a new trial, which will not be disturbed by this court, unless the plaintiff in error shows that the judge abused his discretion, and that the law and the facts required the verdict notwithstanding the judgment of the presiding judge.

3. Where…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bass v. City of MilledgevilleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Peacock v. American Plant Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  3. Buice v. BuiceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  4. Atlanta, Knoxville & Northern Railway Co. v. WhitakerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  5. Gresham v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API