Legal Opinion
Buice v. Buice
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided August 9, 1900PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Certiorari. Before Judge Gober. Forsyth superior court. August term, 1899.
1Opinion of the CourtLittle, J.
The evidence in the case was conflicting, and in no sense demanded the verdict which was rendered. The trial judge did not, therefore, in sustaining the certiorari, abuse the discretion with which he is invested, the result being the grant of a first new trial. Savannah R. Co. v. Fennell, 100 Ga. 477; Williams v. Georgia R. Co., 103 Ga. 575 ; Mitchell v. Braswell, 105 Ga. 502; Weinkle v. Brunswick R. Co., 107 Ga. 367; Crapp v. Morris, 108 Ga. 793.
Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices concurring.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Weinkle & Sons v. Brunswick & Western RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Savannah, Thunderbolt & Isle of Hope Railway v. FennellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Crapp v. MorrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Mitchell v. BraswellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Williams v. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1898
3Cited by4 opinions
- Weathersby v. JordanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Parker v. BridgesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
- Anderson v. SheffieldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
- Thompson v. LawrenceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924