Legal Opinion

Siemen v. Alden

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 23, 1975No. 74-103PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. JUSTICE THOMAS J. MORAN

dehvered the opinion of the court:

Plaintiff sued defendants to recover for injuries he sustained while operating an automated multi-rip saw. The three-count complaint sought recovery on theories of strict tort liability for sale of a defective product, breach of warranties, and negligence. Plaintiff proceeds on this appeal against defendant Korleski only. He appeals the order of the trial court granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment on count one, alleging strict tort liability, and count two, alleging breach of warranties.

Plaintiff had owned and operated a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Suvada v. White Motor Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Balido v. Improved MacHinery, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1972

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Moises Galindo v. Precision American Corp., Georgia Pacific CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  2. Brandt v. Boston Scientific Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Goetz v. Avildsen Tool & MacHines, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  4. Kramer v. Weedhopper of Utah, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  5. MacNeil Automotive Products, Ltd. v. Cannon Automotive Ltd.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API