Legal Opinion
Dickens v. NXP Semiconductors
District Court, N.D. California
Decided November 21, 2023No. 5:23-cv-01073Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ANTOINETTE DICKENS, Case No. 23-cv-01073-PCP 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 9 v. DISMISS 10 NXP SEMICONDUCTORS, Dkt. No. 21 Defendant. 11 12 13 Defendant NXP Semiconductors moves to dismiss plaintiff Antoinette Dickens’s amended 14 complaint. For the reasons that follow, the Court grants the motion based on forum non 15 conveniens. 16 BACKGROUND 17 Dickens worked at NXP Semiconductors in the company’s Hamburg, Germany office as a 18 System Security Manager on the Site Certification Team from February 2018…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Loredana Ranza v. Nike, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Nilo D. Tuazon v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, a Foreign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Lockman Foundation v. Evangelical Alliance Mission Evangelical Alliance Mission of Japan Kenneth G. McVetyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.