Legal Opinion

Psak v. Jewell

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided June 1, 2020No. Civil Action No. 2014-0116Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JERRE PSAK, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 14-116 (RDM) DAVID BERNHARDT,1 Secretary of the Department of the Interior, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This case comes before the Court on Defendant’s motion for summary judgment on all sixteen counts of Plaintiff’s two operative complaints. Dkt. 52; Dkt. 34 (Am. Compl.); No. 18- 115 (Dkt. 1).2 These complaints, stemming from two suits brought by Plaintiff that have since been consolidated, Minute Order (Apr. 25, 2018), challenge a variety of Defendant’s actions as violative of…

2Cases cited71 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API