Legal Opinion
Jim Hood v. JP Morgan Chase & Company, et a
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided December 2, 2013No. 13-60686, 13-60687PublishedCited by 77 opinions
1Per curiam
The Attorney General of Mississippi (the “State”) filed six in parens patriae complaints in the Mississippi Chancery Court alleging six credit card companies (“Defen dants”) violated the Mississippi Consumer Protection Act (“MCPA”) by charging consumers for products they did not want or need. Defendants removed, arguing that there is federal subject matter jurisdiction both because this is a Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (“CAFA”) mass action and because the State’s MCPA claims were preempted by the federal National Banking Act (“NBA”). The district court agreed, and denied the State’s…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by77 opinions
- Sabrina Roppo v. Travelers Commercial InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
- Hawaii Ex Rel. Louie v. HSBC Bank Nevada, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Robertson v. Exxon Mobil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
- Arbuckle Mountain Ranch of Texas, Inc. v. Chesapeake Energy Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
- Rainbow Gun Club, Inc. v. Denbury Onshore, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.