Legal Opinion

Foreman Trust & Savings Bank v. Bartlett

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1926No. 17323. Judgment affirmedPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thompson

March 4, 1917, Elizabeth E. Burdick entered into a written contract with plaintiff in error, Frederick H. Bartlett, for the purchase of two lots for $4360. As the initial payment Mrs. Burdick paid in cash $266 and conveyed to Bartlett by warranty deed two lots owned by her, for which she was credited with the payment of $1700. The remainder of the purchase price was to be paid in monthly installments. Under the contract Bartlett agreed to lay sewer and water pipes in the street and to build sidewalks in front of the property as soon as the city issued permits therefor. The Sanitary District…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Farmers' Bank & Trust Co. v. Shut & KeihnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  2. Baltimore & Suscquehanna Rail-road v. FaunceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1847
  3. Gordon v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Ainslie v. WilsonNew York Supreme Court · 1827
  5. Smith v. TreatIllinois Supreme Court · 1908

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Maton Bros. v. Central Illinois Public Service Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Chasanow v. WillcoxCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
  3. Wilfong v. W. A. Schickedanz Agency, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  4. Hockenbury v. LorentzAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API