Brinkerhoff-Faris Trust & Savings Co. v. Hill
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the CourtGantt, J.
This ease came to me on reassignment. Action to enjoin defendant from collecting alleged excessive taxes. Judgment for defendant and plaintiff appealed. The ease was argued and submitted at our April Term, 1929, and we affirmed the judgment. [323 Mo. 180, 19 S. W. (2d) 746.] The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari, reversed the judgment of this court and remanded the cause for further proceedings not inconsistent with the opinion of that court. [281 U. S. 673.] Our former decision was not upon the merits, but upon plaintiff’s right to maintain the action. The United States Supreme…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Brinkerhoff-Faris Trust & Savings Co. v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Boonville National Bank v. SchlotzhauerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1927
- Jefferson City Bridge & Transit Co. v. BlaserSupreme Court of Missouri · 1927
- Brinkerhoff-Faris Trust & Savings Co. v. HillSupreme Court of Missouri · 1929
- State ex rel. Gottlieb v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1901
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Koplar v. State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
- Garner v. Archers Glen Partners, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
- Washington University v. BaumannSupreme Court of Missouri · 1937
- Kennen v. McFarlingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1942
- City of Cape Girardeau v. Fred A. Groves Motor Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1940
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.