Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

State v. Amend

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided March 11, 2011No. A-10496PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BOLGER, Judge.

John Amend was stopped outside a convenience store for shoplifting. Immediately after he was stopped, Amend admitted to the crime. The police officer then handcuffed Amend and advised him of his Miranda rights. Amend waived his rights and agreed to continue speaking to the officer at the seene; he also agreed to let the officer search the pockets of his clothing.

When the officer searched Amend, he discovered some stolen food items and several OxyContin tablets. When Amend was asked about the tablets, he told the officer that he intended to sell them.

Amend filed a pretrial…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Moran v. BurbineSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Colorado v. SpringSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Stephan v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Thorne v. Department of Public SafetyAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Catlett v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1978

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Yi v. YangAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Selig v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API