Legal Opinion

Burdell v. St. Luke's Hospital

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 20, 1918No. Civ. No. 2308PublishedCited by 17 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

ZOOK, J., pro tem.

In this action for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff Helen E. Burdell through the negligence of defendant’s servants, the court directed a judgment for defendant, from which plaintiffs appeal.

The evidence showed that plaintiff, Mrs. Burdell, entered defendant’s hospital as a paying patient and was charged the regular rates of the hospital for the services rendered to her. The injuries complained of were alleged to have been sustained through the negligence of nurses employed by the hospital, but no evidence was offered to show that defendant was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Thomas v. German Gen. Benevolent Soc'yCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Silva v. Providence Hospital of OaklandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Armstrong v. WallaceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  3. Parker v. St. Stephen's Urban Dev.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990
  4. Dingwell v. SeymourCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  5. Hallinan v. PrindleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API