Legal Opinion

Adriance v. Crews

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1876PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Brazoria. Tried below before the Hon. A. P. McCormick. The facts are given in the opinion, so far as discussed therein.

1Opinion of the Court

Gould, Associate Justice.

-This suit was brought to establish a rejected claim against the estate of C. R. Patton, deceased. The petition alleged that, during the years 1861, 1862, 1863, 1864, and 1865, Adriance, the administrator of said estate, under "the orders of the County Court, carried on a plantation belonging thereto; that in so doing it was necessary for lfim to employ an overseer; that he accordingly contracted with plaintiff Crews, from year to year during said five years, for the sum of eight hundred dollars (gold) per annum; that under said contract plaintiff served the estate as…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Portis v. ColeTexas Supreme Court · 1853
  2. Caldwell v. Young & MorganTexas Supreme Court · 1858
  3. Jones v. LewisTexas Supreme Court · 1854
  4. Price v. McIverTexas Supreme Court · 1860
  5. Adriance v. CrewsTexas Supreme Court · 1873

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hare v. PendletonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  2. Dallas Joint-Stock Land Bank in Dallas v. MaxeyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  3. Reinstein v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Hare v. PendletonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  5. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API