Legal Opinion
In Re Dawson
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided August 21, 2000No. 26,466PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
{1} This matter came before the Court upon the recommendation of the disciplinary board to accept a conditional agreement not to contest and consent to discipline tendered by the respondent, Juan A. Dawson, pursuant to Rule 17-211 NMRA 2000 of the Rules Governing Discipline. Under that agreement, respondent declared his intention not to contest allegations that he violated Rules 16-101, 16-103, 16-104(A) and (B), 16-115(A) and (B), 16-116(D), 16-302, 16-304(C), 16-503, and 16-804(D) and (H) NMRA 2000 of the Rules of Professional Conduct. We adopt the disciplinary board’s recommendation…
3Cases cited9 opinions
- Van Orman v. NelsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- In re SatherSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
- Calderon v. NavaretteNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
- Matter of MartinezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1989
- Matter of TurpenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by7 opinions
- In Re ManceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- In the Matter of YalkutNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2008
- Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court v. HannNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- In Re O'BrienNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2001
- Hammack v. N.M. Taxation & Revenue Dep'tNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.