State v. Moerman
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
VOSS, Judge.
Upon stipulated facts, Defendants David E. Moerman and James A. Diaz were tried and convicted in Phoenix Municipal Court of misconduct involving weapons, a class one misdemeanor, in violation of Arizona Revised Statutes Annotated (“A.R.S.”) section 13-3102(A)(1) (Supp.1992). Each defendant was fined $100.00. Defendants’ cases were consolidated and their convictions and sentences were affirmed on appeal to the superior court.
Defendants present two arguments in this consolidated appeal and special action: (1) That A.R.S. section 13-3102 conflicts unconstitutionally with…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. KorzepArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- Roberts v. SprayArizona Supreme Court · 1950
- New Times, Inc. v. Arizona Board of RegentsArizona Supreme Court · 1974
- State v. DeddensArizona Supreme Court · 1975
- Whitney v. BolinArizona Supreme Court · 1958
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. HarmCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
- Yarbrough v. Montoya-PaezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
- City of Tucson v. RineerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
- State v. McDermottCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- City of Phoenix v. Phoenix Employment Relations BoardCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.