Legal Opinion

Goss v. MAN Roland, et al.

District Court, D. New Hampshire

Decided March 28, 2008No. Civil No. 03-cv-513-SM. Opinion No. 2006 DNH 088Published

1Opinion of the Court

Goss v . MAN Roland, et a l . 03-CV-513-SM 03/28/08 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Goss International Americas, Inc., Plaintiff v. MAN Roland, Inc. and MAN Roland Druckmaschinen AG, Defendants Civil No.03-cv-513-SM Opinion N o .

2008 DNH 061

MAN Roland, Inc. and MAN Roland Druckmaschinen AG, Counterclaim Plaintiffs v. Goss International Americas, Inc., Counterclaim Defendant O R D E R In document n o . 4 6 4 , counterclaim defendant Heidelberger Druckmaschinen AG (“Heidelberger”) moves for reimbursement of its reasonable attorneys’ fees pursuant to Rule 54(d)(2) of the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
C.R. Bard, Inc. v. M3 Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
Federal Power Commission v. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
Crellin Technologies, Inc. v. Equipmentlease Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.