Legal Opinion
State v. Shak
Hawaii Supreme Court
Decided March 6, 1970No. 4804, 4805, 4806, 4808 & 4823PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*613OPINION OP THE COURT BY
RICHARDSON, C.J.
Defendant-appellant Clarence Shak, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted of four violations of traffic laws1 in the District Court of Honolulu. On appeal to the First Circuit Court for trial de novo, he was again convicted, this time after his demand for a jury trial had been refused by the circuit court. The maximum possible penalty for each violation was a $200 fine and revocation or suspension of the operator’s license of the violator,2 along with possible assessment of traffic penalty points pursuant to HRS § 286-128. Defendant was fined $85…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Cheff v. SchnackenbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Callan v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Schick v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- United States v. BarnettSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- State v. ArceoHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. NakataHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. KeliiholokaiHawaii Supreme Court · 1977
- United States v. Wesley G. CranerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Lapp v. City of WorlandWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.