Legal Opinion
Papa v. Union Carbide Corp.
District Court, S.D. West Virginia
Decided July 9, 1997No. Civil Action No. 2:96-0669PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HADEN, Chief Judge.
Pending is Defendant Union Carbide’s motion for summary judgment. For the reasons that follow, the Court GRANTS the motion.
I. BACKGROUND1
In this case, Plaintiff Anthony J. Papa, age 66, contends that, but for Union Carbide’s discrimination against him on the basis of his age, he would have received the promotion he received in 1996 several years earlier.
Papa works at Union Carbide’s South Charleston Technical Center, where he is assigned to the research and development department of the Solvents and Intermediates Strategic Planning Unit. From…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Venable v. ApfelDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1998