Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Gibbs

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 2, 1989No. E.D. Appeal Docket 1986PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

PAPADAKOS, Justice.

This case involves the imposition of a death sentence. The Appellant alleges seventeen errors below. We conclude on one issue that his right to request an attorney pursuant to the warnings required by Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966) and its progeny was impaired by the authorities and his subsequent statements were admitted improperly into evidence. For this reason, we order a new trial following automatic review by this Court pursuant to 42 Pa.C.S. § 9711(h), (i).

Appellant was convicted in the shooting death of a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Oregon v. BradshawSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Commonwealth v. HubbleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Commonwealth v. BronshteinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Commonwealth v. ZookSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Commonwealth v. TemplinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  5. Gibbs v. FrankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API