Legal Opinion

Wilson v. King's Lake Drainage & Levee District

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 5, 1913PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Lincoln Circuit Court.—Hon. James D. Barnett, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

NORTON!, J.

This is a suit in equity and the question for decision arises alone on the face of' the bill. Defendant interposed a demurrer to plaintiff’s *474bill and the court sustained it. Prom this judgment so sustaining the demurrer, plaintiff prosecutes the appeal here. Omitting caption and signatures, the bill is as follows, however the italics employed therein are our own:

“Plaintiff states that at all the-times hereinafter mentioned the defendant was and yet is a body corporate duly incorporated as a drainage district under and by virtue of article five of chapter one hundred and twenty-two…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Louisiana v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Mobile v. WatsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Broughton v. PensacolaSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  4. Morrison v. MoreySupreme Court of Missouri · 1898
  5. Thompson v. AbbottSupreme Court of Missouri · 1875

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Donovan v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1943
  2. Gray v. School District No. 73Missouri Court of Appeals · 1930
  3. DeMun Estate Corp. v. Frankfort General InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1916
  4. Schueler v. City of KirkwoodMissouri Court of Appeals · 1915
  5. Voss v. Des Moines & Mississippi Levee District No. 1Missouri Court of Appeals · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API