Legal Opinion

Rockwell Automation, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided October 20, 2014No. Slip Op. 14-122; Court 05-00269, 05-00582, 06-00054, 06-00348, 07-00110, 07-00294, 10-00230, 10-00245, 11-00018, 11-00250, 12-00001Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RIDGWAY, Judge:

Before the court is Plaintiffs Application for Clarification of Court Order Granting Motion to Extend Time (as corrected), 1 in which Rockwell Automation, Inc. requests clarification of certain statements in Rockwell Automation, Inc. v. United States, 38 CIT -, 7 F.Supp.3d 1278, 2014 WL 4071500 (2014). Application for Clarification of Court Order Granting Motion to Extend Time (“Pl.’s Motion”) at 1, 5-6. 2 Rockwell granted Plaintiffs Amended Consent Motion for Leave identified above, analyzing Rockwell’s out-of-time motions for extensions of time under the relevant…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. RisjordSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Timken Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983
  3. Rhone Poulenc, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
  4. Nsk Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2008
  5. Union Camp Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API