City of Port Arthur v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice White
Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, 79 Stat. 439, as amended, 42 U. S. C. § 1973c, requires that when a State or *161political subdivision covered by the Act1 adopts or seeks to administer any change in its standards, practices, or procedures with respect to voting, it must obtain a preclearance either from the Attorney General of the United States or by obtaining a declaratory judgment from the District Court for the District of Columbia that the proposed change has neither the purpose nor the effect of denying or abridging the right to vote on account of race.2 Perkins v. Matthews, 400…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- City of Rome v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Perkins v. MatthewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- City of Richmond v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- City of Petersburg, Virginia v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Reno v. Bossier Parish School BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Mars Ketchum v. Jane M. ByrneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Butts v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Shaw v. HuntDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1994
- Johnson v. MillerDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1994
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.