Kriha v. Kartak
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in tbe district court for Kamsey county against tbe administrator of tbe estate of Elizabeth M. Kartak, deceased, and tbe beirs at law of tbe decedent, to set aside a decree of divorce, to declare plaintiff to be tbe lawful surviving spouse of decedent, and that be be allowed to share in her estate. Tbe case was tried before Dickson, J., who made findings and ordered judgment in favor of defendants. From an order denying bis motion for a new trial, plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtBuNN, J.
This is an action to set- aside, as obtained by fraud, a judgment of divorce. Tbe decision was in favor of defendant, and plaintiff appeals from an order denying a new trial.
Tbe contention of plaintiff is that tbe finding of tbe trial court that there was no fraud in obtaining tbe judgment is not sustained by tbe evidence.
Tbe evidentiary facts upon which this finding was made are as follows:
Plaintiff and Elizabeth M. Kartak were married in St. Paul December 30, 1909; in September, 1910, they went to Grand Eorks, North Dakota, and began keeping bouse and living together in that city as husband…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- McElrath v. McElrathSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Ogilvie v. OgilvieOregon Supreme Court · 1900
- Weld v. WeldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1880
- Walker v. WalkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
- National Council of Knights & Ladies of Security v. RuderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
3Cited by6 opinions
- Brockman v. BrockmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- In Re Estate of JordanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- Marcus v. National Council of Knights & Ladies of SecuritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Betcher v. Midland National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Walters v. WaltersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.