Legal Opinion

Kinman v. Grousky

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 1935No. Civil No. 3529PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, C. J.

— E. Grousky, hereinafter called plaintiff, brought suit against Bertha S. Kinman, an individual, and Bertha S. Kinman, as guardian of the estates of Thelma Illena Sample and John S. Sample, minors, hereinafter called defendants, to recover the value of certain property of his which he alleged had been converted by defendants. Defendants answered admitting that they were in possession of the property which plaintiff alleged they had converted, but claiming that they held it as security for rent by virtue of a landlord’s lien. The case was tried to a jury, which returned a verdict in favor of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Southwest Cotton Co. v. RyanArizona Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Southwest Cotton Co. v. ClementsArizona Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Humphrey v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Mitchell v. EmbladeArizona Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Southern Arizona Freight Lines, Ltd. v. JacksonArizona Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Tipton v. BursonArizona Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Coyner Crop Dusters v. MarshArizona Supreme Court · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API