Legal Opinion

State v. Louser

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 2017No. Supreme Court 20170023PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

[¶ 1] The State of North Dakota, through Ward County Assistant State’s Attorney Marie A. Miller, petitions this Court for a supervisory writ directing the district court to vacate its order excluding Special Agent Pat Helfrich’s testimony in the matter of State v. Alexander Justin Pittenger, pending in North Central Judicial District Court No. 51-2015-CR-01459. We exercise our supervisory jurisdiction and direct the district court to vacate its order excluding the testimony of Special Agent Pat Helfrich. We conclude the district court’s order was. premature, direct the court to allow the…

3Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. SabinashNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State v. HolteNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State v. DeutscherNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  4. State v. SaulterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State, ex rel. Madden v. RustadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. FosterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  2. State v. WickhamNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  3. State v. RathNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  4. State v. RomanickNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  5. State v. WickhamNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API