Legal Opinion
State v. Saulter
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided April 30, 2009No. 20080220PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CROTHERS, Justice.
[¶ 1] Timothy Saulter appeals a criminal judgment entered after he was found guilty of aggravated assault following a bench trial. Saulter argues the , district court abused its discretion by admitting a law enforcement officer’s expert witness testimony as lay witness opinion- testimony. Although the district court abused its discretion by admitting the officer’s testimony as lay witness opinion testimony, we conclude the error was harmless, and we affirm.
I
[¶ 2] On January 17, 2008, Saulter was charged by information with aggravated assault under N.D.C.C. § 12.1-17-02(1), a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- United States v. RigasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Carlos GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Michael Robert PerkinsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Cornelius Peoples, United States of America v. Xavier LightfootCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. DopplerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Hayden v. Medcenter One, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. EvansNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Community Homes of Bismarck, Inc. v. MainNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. FosterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.