Commonwealth v. Yuhasz
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Chief Justice CAPPY.
The Court granted allocatur in this case to determine whether the sentence imposed pursuant to Pennsylvania’s indeterminate sentencing scheme, which was within the statutory maximum but exceeded the aggravated range of the sentencing guidelines, violates the Sixth Amendment under the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004). For the following reasons, we hold that it does not and thus, the sentence imposed by the trial court is affirmed.
Appellant was arrested and charged with twenty-seven…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Commonwealth v. MouzonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Buffalo Township v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by86 opinions
- People v. LockridgeMichigan Supreme Court · 2015
- Commonwealth v. WallsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Commonwealth v. ShellerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Commonwealth v. MattisonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Commonwealth v. GordonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.