Legal Opinion

Digirolamo v. Superior Court

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided October 22, 1991No. 1 CA-SA 90-285PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TAYLOR, Judge.

This special action arises out of the trial court’s granting of defendants’ motion to vacate offer of judgment for ninety days. The issue whether a trial court can extend the time for response to an offer of judgment under the recently amended version of Rule 68 of the Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure is of statewide concern. We therefore accept jurisdiction.

FACTS

On March 30, 1990, petitioners Nick and Emily Digirolamo (Digirolamo) filed a medical malpractice claim for damages against the real parties in interest, Kenneth West-field, M.D. (Westfield) and Michael D.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Staffend v. Lake Central Airlines, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1969
  2. TWIN CITY CONST CO. OF FARGO, ND v. CantorCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wersch v. Radnor/LandgrantCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  2. Davis v. Discount Tire Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
  3. McReynolds v. American Commerce InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API