Digirolamo v. Superior Court
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TAYLOR, Judge.
This special action arises out of the trial court’s granting of defendants’ motion to vacate offer of judgment for ninety days. The issue whether a trial court can extend the time for response to an offer of judgment under the recently amended version of Rule 68 of the Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure is of statewide concern. We therefore accept jurisdiction.
FACTS
On March 30, 1990, petitioners Nick and Emily Digirolamo (Digirolamo) filed a medical malpractice claim for damages against the real parties in interest, Kenneth West-field, M.D. (Westfield) and Michael D.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Staffend v. Lake Central Airlines, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1969
- TWIN CITY CONST CO. OF FARGO, ND v. CantorCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
3Cited by3 opinions
- Wersch v. Radnor/LandgrantCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
- Davis v. Discount Tire Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
- McReynolds v. American Commerce InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010