Legal Opinion

S & S SALES CORP. v. Marvin Lumber & Cedar Co.

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided October 18, 2006No. 06C0354PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

ADELMAN, District Judge.

Plaintiff S & S Sales, Inc. (“S & S”), a distributor of windows manufactured by defendant Marvin Lumber and Cedar Company (“Marvin”), brought the present action alleging that Marvin violated the Wisconsin Fair Dealership Law (“WFDL”), Wis. Stat. § 135.01 et seq., by selling windows directly (rather than through S & S) to several large dealers in eastern Wisconsin. S & S argued that Marvin’s action substantially changed the arrangement between the parties and requested a preliminary injunction barring Marvin from selling “dealer direct.” I held a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Roland MacHinery Company v. Dresser Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  3. Abbott Laboratories v. Mead Johnson & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  4. Union Oil Company of California v. Dan LeavellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  5. The State of New York v. The Nuclear Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Janiah Monroe, Marilyn Melendez, Lydia Heléna Vision, Sora Kuykendall, and Sasha Reed, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated individuals v. Lamenta Conway, Melvin Hinton, and Latoya HughesDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API