Legal Opinion

Thorpe v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 27, 1993No. 1228-92PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON APPELLANTS MOTION FOR REHEARING AFTER PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW REFUSED

MALONEY, Judge.

A jury convicted appellant of possession of more than twenty-eight grams but less than four hundred grams of methamphetamine. Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann. art. 4476-15, §§ 4.02(b)(6); 4.04(a) & (e) (Vernon Supp. *7401989).1 The trial court assessed punishment, enhanced by two prior felony convictions, at fifty years imprisonment. Id. § 4.012(b)(1);2 Tex.Penal Code Ann. § 12.42(d). The Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction upon appellant’s motion for rehearing. Thorpe v. State, 834 S.W.2d 596…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Engelking v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  2. McGlothlin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  3. Cawthon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  4. Thorpe v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Green v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
  2. Ex Parte Current, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1994
  3. Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1997
  4. Collins v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1998
  5. Wall v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API