State v. Sickles
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.
The state appeals in this case from an order granting a new trial to the defendant in a felony prosecution.
The appeal involves the question as to the validity of § 2, Laws of Extraordinary Session of 1925, p. 420, amending § 2050, Rem. Comp. Stat. [P. C. § 9258]. Section 2 reads as follows:
“Sec. 2. That Section 2050 of Remington’s Compiled Statutes of Washington be amended to read as follows:
£ "Section 2050. All informations shall he filed in the court having jurisdiction of the offense specified therein by the prosecuting attorney of the proper county as informant; he shall subscribe his…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. BokienWashington Supreme Court · 1896
- State v. DicksonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1870
- State v. CookSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
- State v. WilsonWashington Supreme Court · 1912
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. RiceWashington Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. ThomasWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- State v. WillisWashington Supreme Court · 1950
- State v. HutchinsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
- State v. LunsfordWashington Supreme Court · 1931
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.