Legal Opinion

City of Covington v. De Molay

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided May 2, 1933PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Stanley, Commissioner—

Affirming.

At the time of the accident in which appellee, Mrs. Mary De Molay, suffered personal injuries for which •she recovered a judgment for $2,000 against the appellant, city of Covington; Nineteenth street in that city had been recently raised and graded at the point as an inclined approach to a viaduct. To permit settlement and packing before surfacing with concrete, the street had been opened for traffic for about two weeks. On Thursday preceding the accident, an excavation had .been made across the street, about fifteen feet long and two…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gnau v. AckermanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  2. Tudor v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  3. City of Danville v. VanarsdaleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  4. City of Harrodsburg v. SalleeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  5. Gatewood v. City of FrankfortCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Barry v. City of ButteMontana Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Louisville & N. R. Co. v. BellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
  3. Morrow v. City of HarlanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1961
  4. City of Bowling Green v. FordCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
  5. City of Covington v. De MolayCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API