Legal Opinion

Royal Aloha Partners v. Real Estate Division

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 13, 1982No. CA A24786PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJoseph, C. J.

The issue in this proceeding under ORS 183.400 is whether the Real Estate Division has the statutory author-. ity to make rules concerning the sale of “right to use” memberships in condominium time-sharing plans. Petitioner Royal Aloha Partners (Aloha) is involved in the acquisition of condominiums to be used by members of the Royal Aloha Vacation Club (Club). Petitioner Products Management intends to conduct similar activity.

Aloha acquires interests in condominium units in various vacation spots around the world. It then conveys them to Club for use by its members. Title to the property…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gantenbein v. Public Employes' Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  2. Salahub v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  3. Salahub v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. GonzalezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  2. State v. LambertCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  3. Ralston v. Oregon State Correctional InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  4. State v. GonzalezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API