State v. Lambert
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
BARRON, J. pro tempore
Defendant was convicted of boating under the influence of intoxicants, ORS 830.325, after a trial to the court. He appeals, seeking a reversal of his conviction. He contends that the raft in which he was floating was not a boat within the meaning of the statute and that, even if it was a boat, there was not sufficient evidence to show that he operated it or was in actual physical control of it, as required by the statute. We review defendant’s statutory construction contention for errors of law. State v. Thompson, 328 Or 248, 256, 971 P2d 879, cert den, 527 US 1042…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. HallOregon Supreme Court · 1998
- Rash v. McKinstry Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 2001
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HarrisOregon Supreme Court · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ingle v. MatteucciCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
- State v. BilbroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009