Legal Opinion

Bellman v. American International Group

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 2007No. 2005-2162PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Donnell, J.

{¶ 1} On June 19, 2002, Kevin Bellman, together with 23 other claimants, filed a class action lawsuit against 21 insurance carriers alleging that each had engaged in a regular practice of delaying payments on case settlements in an effort to derive financial benefit from the “float” on the settlement funds. “ ‘Float’ refers to the artificial balance created due to delays in processing credits and debits to an account.” In re Cannon (C.A.6, 2002), 277 F.3d 838, 843, fn. 1. Although the record establishes that the claims presented here emanated from different causes of action including torts…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ed Schory & Sons, Inc. v. FrancisOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Galmish v. CicchiniOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Fontbank, Inc. v. Compuserve, IncorporatedOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Peyko v. FrederickOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Hartmann v. DuffeyOhio Supreme Court · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Seyfried v. O'BrienOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
  2. Paulus v. Beck Energy Corp., Court of Appeals of Ohio, Seventh District, Monroe County2017
  3. Beatley v. KnisleyOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. CosmetiCredit, L.L.C. v. World Fin. Network Natl. BankOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. PNC Bank, N.A. v. Springboro Med. Arts, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2015

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API