Ex Parte Hudson
Texas Supreme Court
1Per curiam
In this original habeas corpus proceeding Jim Hudson seeks relief from an order of the district court that he be fined and jailed in punishment for his violation of an injunction, and that he remain confined until he has complied with the injunction. We agree with Hudson that the order punishes him more than once for the same offense, and we therefore set aside the punishment portion of the order. We do not agree, however, with Hudson’s challenges to the coercive portion of the order.
The City of Mesquite annexed land owned by Hudson and his mother on which Hudson operated an auto body shop…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Menna v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Yates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Ex Parte RamzyTexas Supreme Court · 1968
- Ex Parte GenecovTexas Supreme Court · 1945
- Ex Parte PayneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- In Re LongTexas Supreme Court · 1999
- Cadle Co. v. LobingierCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2001
- Ex Parte Jones, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2000
- Mitchell v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2018
- Cadle Co. v. LobingierCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2000
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.