Jones v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
WILLIAMS, Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on Defendant’s motion to dismiss. For the reasons stated below, Defendant’s motion to dismiss is granted.
Plaintiff pro se Donald Jones seeks a $540,000,000 award as a relator in a qui tam action pursuant to Section 3730(d) of the False Claims Act. On July 31, 2011, Plaintiff filed a qui tam action in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia against “7 Major Banks and several smaller ones” to “enforce provisions of repayment of taxpayer funds under the Troubled Assets Recovery Program [ (“TARP”) ].”…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Roland A. Leblanc v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Pennington Seed, Inc. v. Produce Exchange No. 299Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Adair v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.