McBride v. Garland
New Jersey Court of Chancery
On bill. On order to show canse. On motion to strike ont bill.
1Opinion of the Court
Lane, V. C.
The bill, considered as favorably to complainants as possible, may be said to allege that the Prudential Insurance Company of America, at the request of Edward M. Riehman, deceased, and in consideration of premium paid by him, issued its policy of insurance upon his life, payable to Mabel Brooks Garland, his mistress; that Riehman obtained the policy and had it made payable to Garland upon Garland’s promise that she would continue illicit relations with him; that such illicit relations continued; that the contract between Garland and Riehman was immoral and illegal; that the policy…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ely v. Hartford Life Ins.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
- Reed v. BakerMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
- Hinton v. Penn Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
- Coe v. GarveyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1906
3Cited by9 opinions
- Broderick v. RosnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Atkinson v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Rousu v. Collins Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
- Elgart v. MintzNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1938
- Cameron v. Penn Mutual Life Ins. Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1932
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.