Legal Opinion

Cohen v. Pelagatti

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 13, 1987No. 01668PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROSKY, Judge:

This is an appeal from an order sustaining preliminary objections, in the nature of a demurrer, to appellants’ counterclaims, and dismissing said counterclaims with prejudice. Appellants’ sole contention on appeal is that the trial court erred in dismissing their counterclaims, arguing that a civil conspiracy case cannot be dismissed on the basis of demurrer, even where damages claimed may exceed damages ultimately recoverable. Upon review of the record below, we now affirm.

The current litigation involves a rather complex factual and procedural history. The relevant portion of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. BAKER v. RANGOSSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Spain v. VicenteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Commonwealth v. Musser Forests, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  4. Mariscotti v. TinariSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Cohen v. PelagattiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Pelagatti v. CohenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Ibn-Sadiika v. RiesterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Gilbert v. FeldDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Centennial School District v. Independence Blue CrossDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Deitrick v. CostaDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2019

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API