Legal Opinion
Werth v. Makita Electric Works, Ltd.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided November 25, 1991No. 88-1596PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLOWAY, Circuit Judge.
This appeal is from a judgment, entered on a verdict directed at the conclusion of plaintiffs’ evidence, in favor of the defendants-appellees Makita Electric Works, Ltd. and Makita, U.S.A., Inc. (together Makita). The plaintiffs-appellants, Gilbert and Kathleen Werth suing on behalf of their minor son, brought this diversity products liability action in the United States District Court of the District of Kansas.1 The claims of error focus on the trial judge’s exclusion of the proffered testimony of two of plaintiffs’ expert witnesses. We agree that rejection of the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Specht v. JensenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Sil-Flo, Inc. v. SFHC, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Wheeler v. John Deere Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Mays v. Ciba-Geigy Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1983
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Wilson v. MuckalaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Truck Insurance Exchange v. Magnetek, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- Okland Oil Company v. Conoco Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Randall S. Bragg v. Bill Heard Chevrolet, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Roe v. FCA USCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2022
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.