State Ex Rel. Hicks v. Corporation Commission
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Otjeiam.
There is no error in the judgment in this action that the relator, W. L. Hicks, guardian of Glenn Hawkins, Joseph Hawkins and Hazel Hawkins, infants, recover of the defendants the sum of $3,000, with interest and costs.
There is error, however, in so much of the judgment as orders and adjudges that the relator has a preferred claim on the assets of the Farmers Bank and Trust Company, now in the hands of the Corporation Commission or its successor, the Commissioner of Banks of North Carolina, or of the defendant, John D. Biggs, liquidating agent. See Bank v. Corp. Com., ante, 382,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- First & Citizens National Bank v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- State Ex Rel. Roebuck v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
3Cited by11 opinions
- Trust Co. v. . Hood, Comr. of BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- Ex Parte MichieSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1932
- Cocke v. Hood Ex Rel. Central Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- In Re Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
- In re Garner Banking & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.