Legal Opinion

Rachelle Laboratories, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided April 10, 1973No. C.D. 4416PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Richardson, Judge:

The merchandise of these consolidated actions consists of a chemical described as Chloramphenicol Intermediate D-threo-l-p-nitrophenyl-2-amino-propnediol-(1.3), which is commonly referred to as “levo base”, and said to be the 12th intermediate in the manufacture of chloramphenicol. The levo base at bar was exported from West Germany between July and September of 1968, entered at the port of Los Angeles, California, and advanced in value under appraisement based on American selling price as defined in 19 U.S.C.A., section 1401a(e) (section 402(e), Tariff Act of 1930, as…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. A. Zerkowitz & Co., Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
  2. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Fifth Avenue Coach Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
  3. Aldrich Chemical Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Corning Glass Works v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1977
  2. Rachelle Laboratories, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API