Legal Opinion
State v. Vinther
Washington Supreme Court
Decided August 29, 1935No. 25526. Department TwoPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.
On a former appeal, State v. Vinther, 176 Wash. 391, 29 P. (2d) 693, the case was reversed because of the error of the lower court in holding that the action was barred by the statute of limitations and remanded for further proceedings.
On remand, respondent answered to the complaint of appellant, among other matters, after denying liability for negligence, admitted that McNaught Davis was a deputy sheriff of Spokane county; admitted the collision; admitted that Lillian McNaught Davis, his widow, signed the document attached as an exhibit to the complaint of appellant, which, among other…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Spokane & Inland Empire Railroad v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Whitley v. Spokane & Inland Railway Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1913
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1918
- Dodson v. Continental Can Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1930
- Ray v. Industrial Insurance CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1917
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Industrial Commission v. NevelleArizona Supreme Court · 1941
- State v. StarrWashington Supreme Court · 1935
- Ebsary v. Pioneer Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990
- Springer v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1940
- State v. VintherWashington Supreme Court · 1936
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.