Legal Opinion

McPike v. Pew

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 15, 1871PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Louisiana Court of Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtCurrier, Judge

The plaintiff instituted these proceedings to enjoin the collection of a special lax levied by the County Court of Pike county. They aver in their petition that the levy was “ wholly unauthorized and void.” This averment states the case out of court, for if the levy was void, it clothed no one with even a color of right to enforce the collection of the tax. An officer seizing property under such void tax levy would be a mere trespasser, and the injured party would have an ample remedy at law. The remedy by injunction is not applicable to the facts stated in the petition. (Sayre v. Tompkins,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Barrow v. DavisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1870
  2. Hopkins v. LovellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1870

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Williams v. County Court of Grant Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Jacobs v. CauthornSupreme Court of Missouri · 1922
  3. Equitable Guarantee & Trust Co. v. DonahoeCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1899
  4. Second Nat. Bank of Titusville v. CaldwellDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1882

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API