Legal Opinion
Guzman v. Van Demark
District Court, C.D. California
Decided January 14, 1987No. Civ. 86-2250 RG(Gx)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
GADBOIS, District Judge.
On August 24, 1984, plaintiff Joseph Guzman (“Guzman”) was arrested for suspicion of drunk driving. Incident to the arrest, an altercation ensued between Guzman and his wife, and defendants J.M. Van Demark and S.A. Wood, officers of the Department of California Highway Patrol (“CHP”). Plaintiffs seek monetary relief under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985, and under various California laws for injuries allegedly caused by the tortious conduct of the CHP officers. The several defendants, including the State of California (“the State”) and the CHP, have moved to dismiss…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Quern v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Micomonaco v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Mario Micomonaco v. State Of WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Keller v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1987
- Johnson v. City of ChicoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1989
- Union of Flight Attendants, Local No. 1 v. Air Micronesia, Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.