Washington County Board of Equalization v. Rushmore Borglum Ministries, Inc.
Nebraska Court of Appeals
1DissentCarlson, Judge
I respectfully dissent from the majority’s determination that we do not have jurisdiction in this matter and the conclusion that this appeal should be dismissed.
Jurisdiction.
The rationale of the majority’s opinion that this court does not have jurisdiction is based on the incorrect premise that the key date in any analysis is the first Board “hearing” of May 23, 2000. The gravamen of the jurisdictional question in this case is the stipulated and agreed-upon fact that Rushmore was not given notice that a hearing would be held on May 23. This notice requirement is clearly spelled out and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In Re Interest of Natasha H.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1999
- Indian Hills Community Church v. County Board of EqualizationNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
- Marshall v. WimesNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
- Ev. Lutheran Good Samaritan Society v. Buffalo County Board of EqualizationNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
- Harrison Square Partnership v. Sarpy County Board of EqualizationNebraska Court of Appeals · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.