Legal Opinion · Dissent

Abbott v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided May 20, 1986No. F-84-471Published

1Dissent

PARKS, Presiding

Judge, dissenting:

I dissent. In my opinion, the closing argument by Assistant District Attorney Chris Ross was so improper that “the lack of contemporaneous objection is not controlling ... [as] the errors complained of are fundamental and prejudicial to the appellant’s right to a fair trial” Langdell v. State, 657 P.2d 162, 164 (Okl.Cr.1982).

The ABA Standards for Criminal Justice, adopted by this Court in Tart v. State, 634 P.2d 750 (Okl.Cr.1981), provide-that it shall be unprofessional conduct for a prosecutor to “express his personal belief or opinion as to the truth or…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Cobbs v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1981
  2. Ray v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1973
  3. Langdell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1982
  4. Tart v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1981
  5. Cole v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1946

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API