Abbott v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1Dissent
PARKS, Presiding
Judge, dissenting:
I dissent. In my opinion, the closing argument by Assistant District Attorney Chris Ross was so improper that “the lack of contemporaneous objection is not controlling ... [as] the errors complained of are fundamental and prejudicial to the appellant’s right to a fair trial” Langdell v. State, 657 P.2d 162, 164 (Okl.Cr.1982).
The ABA Standards for Criminal Justice, adopted by this Court in Tart v. State, 634 P.2d 750 (Okl.Cr.1981), provide-that it shall be unprofessional conduct for a prosecutor to “express his personal belief or opinion as to the truth or…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Cobbs v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1981
- Ray v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1973
- Langdell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1982
- Tart v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1981
- Cole v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1946
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.