Tart v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CORNISH, Judge:
Tony Ray Tart was convicted of Burglary in the First Degree, After Former Conviction of a Felony.
The crucial issue raised by the appellant is alleged prosecutorial misconduct. The cornerstone of American jurisprudence is the right to be afforded a fair and impartial trial. This right becomes meaningless if the State is allowed to make inflammatory and prejudicial arguments. Prosecutorial comments should be confined to the evidence presented at trial and any reasonable inferences that can be fairly drawn there*751from. This standard allows the prosecutor wide latitude in…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Cobbs v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1981
- Neal v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1979
3Cited by25 opinions
- Collier v. State of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 1985
- Omalza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1995
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1983
- Cleary v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1997
- Huddleston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1985
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.