Legal Opinion

Dietrich v. Hoefelmeir

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 19, 1901PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Muskegon; Russell, J. Trover by Jacob Dietrich and Leo Dietrich against Benjamin Hoefelmeir. From a judgment for defendant on verdict directed by the court, plaintiffs bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

This is an action of trover brought to recover the value of 40 sheep claimed to have been converted by the defendant to his own use on the 6th day of January, 1900. The declaration was in the usual form of declarations in trover. The plea was the general issue, with notice of a contract between the parties by which the defendant took 20 sheep from the plaintiffs, to double in four years from the 6th day of January, 1896, and also *146a notice of tender. Some time in the month of December, 1895, one of the plaintiffs met the defendant at his place of business in Ravenna, when the defendant wanted…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Scott v. BushMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Wardell v. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Kelly v. KellyMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Raub v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Winner v. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McCurdy v. DillonMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Aylor v. McInturfMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914
  3. Bird v. BilbyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API