Legal Opinion

Government of the Virgin Islands v. Harthman

Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands

Decided January 25, 1983No. Criminal No. F64-1982PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHodge, Presiding Judge

OPINION

I

This matter is before the court on defendant’s motion for a bench trial. Both sides agree that when there is no demand for a jury trial, a defendant in the Virgin Islands is entitled to a bench trial, but they disagree as to what constitutes a proper demand for a jury trial. While the defendant contends that a demand made orally by his attorney at arraignment without discussion or advice and without his knowing and intelligent authorization is null anfr void, the government contends that a demand is properly invoked where the defendant is present and makes no objection when his…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Estelle v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Singer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. United States of America Ex Rel. Clinton Burnett v. People of the State of IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Government of the Virgin Islands v. BoynesSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2003
  2. Weer v. Hess Oil Virgin Islands Corp.Superior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API