Government of the Virgin Islands v. Harthman
Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands
1Opinion of the CourtHodge, Presiding Judge
OPINION
I
This matter is before the court on defendant’s motion for a bench trial. Both sides agree that when there is no demand for a jury trial, a defendant in the Virgin Islands is entitled to a bench trial, but they disagree as to what constitutes a proper demand for a jury trial. While the defendant contends that a demand made orally by his attorney at arraignment without discussion or advice and without his knowing and intelligent authorization is null anfr void, the government contends that a demand is properly invoked where the defendant is present and makes no objection when his…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Estelle v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Singer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States of America Ex Rel. Clinton Burnett v. People of the State of IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Government of the Virgin Islands v. BoynesSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2003
- Weer v. Hess Oil Virgin Islands Corp.Superior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2016