Goldstone v. Bloomfield Township Public Library
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMaekman, J.
We granted leave to appeal to consider whether Const 1963, art 8, § 9, which states that public libraries “shall be available to all residents of the state,” requires each individual public library facility in Michigan to offer nonresident book-borrowing privileges.1 *557The lower courts answered this question in the negative, and we agree, although for different reasons. Therefore, we affirm.
I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Plaintiff is a resident of the city of Bloomfield Hills. The city does not have its own public library, but from 1964 to November 12, 2003, had entered into a “library service…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Martin v. City of StruthersSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Abela v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2004
- Wayne County v. HathcockMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
- Crego v. ColemanMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Citizens Protecting Michigan's Constitution v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 2018
- National Pride at Work, Inc v. GovernorMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
- Capitol Properties Group, LLC v. 1247 Center Street, LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
- Toll Northville Ltd v. Northville TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
- Herrick District Library v. Library of MichiganMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.