Legal Opinion

Goldstone v. Bloomfield Township Public Library

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 2007No. Docket 130150PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMaekman, J.

We granted leave to appeal to consider whether Const 1963, art 8, § 9, which states that public libraries “shall be available to all residents of the state,” requires each individual public library facility in Michigan to offer nonresident book-borrowing privileges.1 *557The lower courts answered this question in the negative, and we agree, although for different reasons. Therefore, we affirm.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Plaintiff is a resident of the city of Bloomfield Hills. The city does not have its own public library, but from 1964 to November 12, 2003, had entered into a “library service…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Martin v. City of StruthersSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Abela v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Wayne County v. HathcockMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Crego v. ColemanMichigan Supreme Court · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Citizens Protecting Michigan's Constitution v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 2018
  2. National Pride at Work, Inc v. GovernorMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Capitol Properties Group, LLC v. 1247 Center Street, LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. Toll Northville Ltd v. Northville TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Herrick District Library v. Library of MichiganMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API